Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6304 (AP)

GURRAM VENKATA PRASADA RAO v. TALAPANENI VENKATADRI

CRP/554/2019 · 2026-07-15

Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010055612019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3606] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 554/2019 Between: 1. GURRAM VENKATA PRASADA RAO, S/O SIVAJI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/ O 10/3, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR CITY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. TALAPANENI VENKATADRI, Sio lakshmaiah, Aged about 38 years, R/o 1/3, Kakumanuvari Thota, Guntur. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the order and decree dated 31.10.2018 passed in E.P.No. 43 of 2017 in O.S.No. 976 of 2008 by the learned IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the order dated 31.10.2018 passed in EP.No. 43 of 2017 in OS.No. 976 of 2008 by the learned IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur pending disposal of the CRP and tpass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 554/2019 ORDER: Sri V. Surya Kiran Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed against E.P.No.43 of 2017 before the Trial Court, has been decreed. As per section reported that said E.P has dismissed for default and the cause does not survive in/ the present Civil Revision Petition. 2. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interim order granted, if any, shall stand vacated. Consequently, all pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand closed in terms of this order. _____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J Dated: 16.07.2026 BSM 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 554/2019 Dated: 16.07.2026 BSM