Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6302 (AP)

B NAGAPPA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11510/2025 · 2026-07-15

Nyapathy Vijay

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010230042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 11510/2025 Between: 1. B NAGAPPA, S/O HANUMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC OFFICE SUBORDINATE (SUPERANNUATED), R/O D.NO. 1- 300B, PULAMATHI VILLAGE, LEPAKSHI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND THE CHARIMAN SURPLUS MANPOWER CELL SMPC, , ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE OFFICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 5. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COOPERATIVE RURAL IRRIGATION CORPORATION APSCRIC, H.NO. 52-113-414C, 2 ROAD NO.1B, NTR COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR/MANAGING DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issuance of an appropriate Writ. Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring that action of the 3rd respondent in issuing impugned proceedings vide No.A6/DEE/ATP/Establishment/2025 dated 31.03.2025 retiring the petitioner from his services on attaining the age of superannuation of 60 years as bad, illegal, arbitrary and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.15, Finance (HR.IV-FR and LR) Department, dated 31.01.2022 and also contrary the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 14,16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled to be continued in service upto the age of 62 (Sixty Two) years in terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, Finance (HR.IV-FR and LR) Department, dated 31.01.2022 with all consequential monetary and service benefits and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate and continue the services of the petitioners till they attain the age of 62 years by suspending the operation of the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent vide No.A6/DEE/ATP/Establishment/2025 dated 31.03.2025, pending disposal of the present writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M VENKATA SAI NIKHIL KASHYAP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.11510 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not enhancing the age of superannuation of the Petitioner from 60 years to 62 years, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner had submitted that the State Government had recently issued G.O.Ms.No.45, (Finance (HR.IV- FR&LR) Department), dated 02.07.2026 according approval for enhancement of age of superannuation from 60 to 62 years for regular employees of PSUs, Corporations and Societies included under Schedules IX and X of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act-2014 retrospectively with effect from 01-01-2022. 3. In view of the implementation of the aforesaid G.O, no further orders are required to be passed and this Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the Petitioner to question the entitlement for his salary and retirement benefits in independent proceedings. 4. No order as to costs. 5 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date: 16.07.2026 chs Whether the order is: Speaking ✔ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ✔ 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 114 WRIT PETITION No.11510 of 2025 Dated:16.07.2026 chs