Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6299 (RAJ)

KRISHNA S/O SULTAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2841/2026 · 2026-02-18

Sandeep Taneja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2841/2026 1. Krishna S/o Sultan, R/o Holapura Hetampur, Police Station Saraichhola, District Morena Madhya Pradesh. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). 2. Bhairo Poshwal S/o Puran Singh, R/o Maharaj Bagh Chauraha Gurjarpada Badi District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur) ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain Mr. Udit Sapra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 18/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 59/2017 registered at Police Station Basaidang, District Dholpur for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 386 IPC and Section 11 RDAA Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present matter pertains to bail jump as the petitioners were earlier enlarged on bail by this Court. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners, being labourers went out of State to earn their livelihood and for the aforesaid reason they could not appear before the trial Court on the date of hearing, resulting into forfeiture of their bail bonds by the Trial Court. Learned counsel (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2841/2026] also submits that the petitioners themselves surrendered before the trial Court on 06.02.2026 and since then they are in custody. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners shall not impede the course of trial, they are ready to abide by the conditions imposed by this Court and assure that the petitioners shall not make an attempt to jump the bail again, therefore, in the interest of justice, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioners namely, Krishna S/o Sultan and Bhairo Poshwal S/o Puran Singh are ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each, out of whom one surety should be a close relative of the petitioners, to the satisfaction of the trial Court for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/73