IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18533 of 2021 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18535 of 2021 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18537 of 2021 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18538 of 2021 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18541 of 2021 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 377 of 2022 ===================================================== PATEL DAXABEN NARAYANBHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ===================================================== Appearance: MR GAURAV CHUDASAMA(5660) AND MS VIDHI J BHATT for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR HENIL SHAH ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3 MR MANISH J PATEL(2131) for the Respondent(s) No. 4 MR NIRAV K PADHIYAR(5678) for the Respondent(s) No. 5,6 ===================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI Date : 20/01/2026 COMMON ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Advocate Mr. Gaurav Chudasama and learned Advocate Ms. Vidhi Bhatt, appearing for the petitioners, under instructions state that vide orders dated 17.01.2026 and 08.01.2026, p. 2 passed by the District Primary Education Officer, District Education Committee, Himmatnagar, by way of two separate orders and based on the order dated 08.01.2026 passed by the Director of Primary Education, Gandhinagar, the order dated 24.11.2021 has been quashed and set aside and it has been decided to grant full pay scale to the petitioners, which has redressed the grievance of the petitioners. However, they submit that though the orders have been passed, the actual payment has not been made and therefore, necessary directions be issued to respondent Nos. 2, 3, and 4 to make payment pursuant to the orders dated 08.01.2026 and 17.01.2026, copies of which are placed on record by learned Advocate Mr. Gaurav Chudasama and learned Advocate Ms. Vidhi Bhatt appearing for the petitioners. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Henil Shah, appearing for the respondent–State, upon instructions from Shri M. N. Gadhvi, District p. 3 Education Officer, Sabarkantha, states that the impugned show cause notice dated 29.11.2021 shall not be acted upon in view of the subsequent orders dated 08.01.2026 and 17.01.2026, as the said notice has now become redundant. 3. In view of the above, learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Henil Shah states that since the impugned orders have been quashed, the directions are required to be complied with by respondent Nos. 2, 3, and 4 and shall be complied with at the earliest. However, though the aforesaid statement may be said to be sufficient, respondent Nos. 2, 3, and 4 are directed to comply with the orders dated 17.01.2026 and 08.01.2026 on or before 31.03.2026. 4. In view of the above directions, as the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed, learned Advocate Mr. Gaurav Chudasama as well as learned Advocate Ms. Vidhi Bhatt, appearing for p. 4 the petitioners, do not press the present petitions, with liberty to file appropriate petition(s)/proceedings in the event of non- compliance with the orders dated 17.01.2026 and 08.01.2026. Accordingly, the present petitions stand disposed of as not pressed. (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) Pallavi