Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6297 (AP)

G. Suryanarayana, v. State of Andhra Pradesh;

WP/37843/2013 · 2026-07-19

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010592412013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 37843/2013 Between: 1. G. SURYANARAYANA,, S/O. G. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 79-8-7/1, POSTAL COLONY, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT , SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. RAHMUNDRY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. K RAMBABU, S/O SRI RAMMURTHY, AGED 63 VEERS 0CC: BUSINESS 4. K CHANDRAVATHI, W/O. K.RAMBABU AGED 56 YEARS OCC; HOUSEWIFE 5. K V V SIRSISH KUMAR, S/O. K.RAMBABU AGED 41 YEARS (RESPONDENTS 3,4 AND 5 R/O. D.NO.30-20/3-15/1 GEETHA MANDIR STREET CHUTHAGUTTA VIJAYAWADA. 6. K V DURGA KISHORE KUMAR, S/O.K.RAMBABU, AGED 37 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.28, ABM AVENUE, NEAR PARK SHERTON HOTEL, CHENNAI 7. S V SATYANARAYANA, S/O APPA RAO AGED 70 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, PROPRIETOR, MAYURI HOTEL, R/O. 7-28-2 VYGRAM ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. -2- HN, J W.P.No.37843_2013 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate Writ or order declaring the action of the respondents in not taking immediate steps to prevent the unofficla respondents form making illegal construction/renovations in the cellar of premises bearing No. 7- 28-2, Vygram Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, by considering the representation dt. 12.12.2013 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the resopondents to take immediate steps to prevent the unofficial respondents to make construction/renovation in premises No. 7-28-2, situated at Vygram Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 47088 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the resopondents to take immediate steps to prevent the unofficial respondents to make construction/renovation in premises No. 7-28-2, situated at Vygram Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N SIVA REDDY 2. K VENKATESH 3. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV -3- HN, J W.P.No.37843_2013 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for any further consideration, as the subsequent orders have been passed by the respondent authorities, which would be challenged by the petitioner(s). 2. Recording the said submission, this Court is of the view that no adjudication on merits is required in this writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:20.07.2026 NKA -4- HN, J W.P.No.37843_2013 188 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 37843 of 2013 Date: 20.07.2026 NKA