B. JAYAKUMAR v. Home, Prohibition and Excise State rep. by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/855/2026 · 2026-01-21
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 62935 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 62935 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 855 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 855 of 2026 B. Jayakumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, E2 - Thirukazhukundram Police Station, Chengalpet District. (Crime No. 422 of 2025) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No. 422 of 2025 on the file of respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.Sasikala B For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) of BNS (Sections 420 of IPC) r/w https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 855 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Section 15 & 15(3) of Indian Medical Council Act 1956, in Crime No.422 of 2025 seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, who is a Homeopathy Doctor, has been practising Allopathy without registration before the Medical Council, thereby cheating the general public. Hence, the competent authority has lodged the present complaint.
3. Earlier, this Court has considered the case of the petitioner on merits and dismissed the same by an order dated 19.11.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.30567 of 2025 and without any change in circumstances, this second successive anticipatory bail application has been filed.
4. This Court, while dismissing the earlier anticipatory bail application has observed as follows:
“6.Considering the submissions made and also the fact that, if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail, he may continue to engage in similar activities which could endanger the general public, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.” https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 855 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
5. So far, there is no change in circumstances for reconsidering the above observation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6 . Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 21-01-2026 gbi To 1.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, E2 - Thirukazhukundram Police Station, Chengalpet District. (Crime No. 422 of 2025) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 855 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.RAJASEKAR, J. gbi CRL OP No. 855 of 2026 21-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis