DINESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI MALAKIYA v. RAJSHRIBEN DINESHBHAI MALAKIYA
CR.MA/21944/2025 · 2026-01-09
P M Raval
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6291 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6291 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 21944 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/33239/2025 ================================================= DINESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI MALAKIYA Versus RAJSHRIBEN DINESHBHAI MALAKIYA & ORS. ================================================= Appearance: MR.MRUDUL M BAROT(3750) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 4 ================================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 09/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned advocate Mr. Krunal Shah has instructions to appear for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. He shall file his appearance in due Course, which the registry shall accept.
2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates for the respective respondents waive service.
3. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 75 days caused in filing the p. 2 captioned revision application.
4. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties.
5. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/43tss9126