SAPNA W/O CHHUTTAN LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/337/2026 · 2026-03-05
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6290 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6290 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9524] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 337/2026
1. Sapna W/o Chhuttan Lal Meena, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Layda Ka Guvada, Talab, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, Presently Resident Of Teebda Mohalla, Kundroli, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.). Aadhar No. 8855-9611-1922
2. Chhuttan Lal Meena Son Of Shri Heera Lal Meena, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of B-92, Pratap Vihar, Khora Colony, Indirapura, Shipra Suncity, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, Presently Resident Of Teebda Mohalla, Kundroli, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) D.l. No. Rj02 20230020565 ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Alwar.
3. The Nodal Officer, SP Office, Alwar.
4. SHO Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar.
5. Chhuttan Lal Meena Son Of Unknown, Resident Of Layda Ka Guvada, Talab, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
6. Lali Devi W/o Chhuttan Lal Meena, Resident Of Layda Ka Guvada, Talab, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 05/03/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 & 6 as they
[2026:RJ-JP:9524] (2 of 2) [CRLW-337/2026] are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Vedic Hindu Sabha, Nasratpura, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh on 13.02.2026 and same has been registered on 16.02.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 & 6 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /94