SOHAN KUMAR SAHA @ SOHAN SAHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1457/2026 · 2026-03-11
Rajesh Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 629 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 629 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6348
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1457 of 2026 ---- Sohan Kumar Saha @ Sohan Saha, aged about 21 years, Son of Logen Saha, Resident of Village Devpur, P.O.+P.S.- Hiranpur, District – Pakur, Jharkhand. …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
: Mr. Pramendra Kr. Mehta, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P.
----
02/Dated: 11th March, 2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant who is in custody since 06.09.2025 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.238 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [however, charge-sheet submitted and cognizance was taken under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 112(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023], pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
4. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that no incriminating material has been seized from the conscious possession of the applicant. Further, the applicant is a student. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
5.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. It appears that the applicant has criminal antecedent of the similar nature. It is an organized crime in this area and are being committed in an organized manner.
7. Considering the fact that it is an organized crime, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the present bail application is hereby rejected.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 11th March, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 12.03.2026