Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 62718 (MAD)

Sujthkumar @ Susikumar v. The State of Tamilnadu rep by

CRL OP(MD)/16876/2026 · 2026-08-10

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16876 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10.08.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No. 16876 of 2026 Sujithkumar @ Susikumar ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruppanandhal Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No.495 of 2020) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.PR.Boomeerajan Advocate For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 495 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.07.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 307, 324, 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.495 of 2020 on the file of the respondent 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16876 of 2026 police, seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has committed crime for the above said offences. Hence, the petitioner was earlier arrested and released on bail. Investigation in this case has been completed and charge sheet was also filed and the same was taken cognizance and pending trial in S.C.No. 55 of 2025 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC), Kumbakonam. The petitioner has appeared before the trial Court regularly. On 21.07.2026, the petitioner was absent to appear before the trial court. Hence, NBW was issued and the same was executed on 30.07.2026. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner has appeared before the trial Court regularly. Due to some unavoidable circumstances, he was not able to appear before the trial Court. Hence, the non bailable warrant was issued against him. Now the petitioner is in custody from 30.07.2026 and ready to co-operate with the trial process. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioners. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16876 of 2026 4. The learned Counsel appearing for the State reiterated the prosecution case and reported that now the case is posted for trial. The petitioner has three previous cases. Hence, he opposed to grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. The NBW was issued on 21.07.2026 and the petitioner was arrested on 30.07.2026, within a period of 10 days after issuance of NBW. Now he is in custody and now the case is also proceeding end and also considering the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions. [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC), Kumbakonam, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC), Kumbakonam, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks, thereafter as and when required 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16876 of 2026 by the trial Court: [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 51730]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (K R S J) 10.08.2026 TM 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16876 of 2026 To 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC), Kumbakonam. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruppanandhal Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No.495 of 2020) 3.The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Thiruvidaimaruthur. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16876 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 16876 of 2026 Date : 10.08.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis