Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6269 (JHR)

VIMAL NAG v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3046/2026 · 2026-04-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:10895 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3046 of 2026 ------ Vimal Nag, aged about 22 years, Son of Paskal Nag, Resident of Village-Raibera, P.O. & P.S.-Goilkera, District-West Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Imran Beig, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-16-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Manoharpur P.S. Case No. 45 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 308(3), 308(4), 308(5), 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the member of CPI Moist banned organization and was caught by the police with pamphlets of the said organization; while from the co-accused person, 15% of the work estimate was recovered, which was used for demanding extortion money and extortion money was recovered from the petitioner. It is next submitted that one keypad mobile phone and SIM were recovered. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.12.2025 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application and charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sub Divisional Court, Chakradharpur, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa in connection with Manoharpur P.S. Case No. 45 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 16.04.2026 Nandini/