SREE VINAYAKA AGENCIES v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/18223/2026 · 2026-07-23
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6269 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6269 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010342582026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 24 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 18223/2026 BETWEEN:
1. SREE VINAYAKA D.No. 19-10-25, NEW INDIRA NAGAR AIR BYPASS ROAD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DIRECTOR, WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, JAMPANI TOWERS, LODGE CENTER GUNTUR, AP
3. OGGU SUDHEER S/O LATE OGGU SUDHARKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: PROPRIETOR, M/s. PURI JAGANNATH ENTERPRISES, PODALAKURU ROAD, NELLORE, AP-524004.0 R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER OF THE COURT DATED 08.07.2026 VIDE ORDER PASSED IN I.A.NO.2 OF 2026. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 18223/2026 SREE VINAYAKA AGENCIES, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, 25, NEW INDIRA NAGAR AIR BYPASS ROAD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517501. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238. THE DIRECTOR, WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, JAMPANI TOWERS, LODGE CENTER GUNTUR, AP- 522002. OGGU SUDHEER S/O LATE OGGU SUDHARKAR RAO, AGED YEARS, OCC: PROPRIETOR, M/s. PURI JAGANNATH ENTERPRISES, PODALAKURU ROAD, 524004.0 R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER OF THE COURT DATED 08.07.2026 VIDE ORDER PASSED IN
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more
[3330] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO AGENCIES, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, 25, NEW INDIRA NAGAR AIR BYPASS ROAD, ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AT VELAGAPUDI, THE DIRECTOR, WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, JAMPANI TOWERS, LODGE OGGU SUDHEER S/O LATE OGGU SUDHARKAR RAO, AGED YEARS, OCC: PROPRIETOR, M/s. PURI JAGANNATH ENTERPRISES, PODALAKURU ROAD, 524004.0 R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER OF THE COURT DATED 08.07.2026 VIDE ORDER PASSED IN ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more
2
particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS challenging the action of 2nd respondent in disqualifying the petitioners tender application at prequalification /technical bid stage opened on 03.07.2026 vide Tender ID 944620 initiated by the 2nd respondent though AP E-procurement portal for supply of Balasanjeevini and Balasanjeeveni Tribal kits to Anganwadi center in ICDS project unit III as per E procurement tender notice dated 10.06.2026, is being bad, illegal, arbitrary, contrary to tender conditions, discriminatory and offends Article 14 and 19 of Constitution of India and consequentially to direct the 2nd respondent to open the Financial bid of the petitioner, submitted on 22.06.2026 and to award work order, if found the petitioner to be successful bidder being LI in the said tender process interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V N NARASIMHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL
2. CHILUKURI KARTHIK The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
Smt. V. Hima Bindu, learned counsel represented on behalf of Sri V.V.N. Narasimham, learned counsel on record and sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.07.2026
Harin
4
74 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
W.P.No. 18223 of 2026
Date: 24-07-2026
Harin