Anand v. The Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption
WP Crl./1040/2026 · 2026-04-30
M Nirmal Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6268 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6268 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Crl. No. 1040 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR WP Crl. No. 1040 of 2026 Anand ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Alandur, Chennai-600 016. 2. The Deputy Superintend of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chengalpattu-603 001. 3. The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chengalpattu-603 001. 4. The Inspector General of Registration No.100, Snathome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028. 5. Nepoleon The Sub Registrar, Navalur, Chengalpattu District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take further action on petitioner’s representation dated 15.04.2026 to hold a preliminary enquiry into the allegations against the 5th respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Ranjith Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1040 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to take further action on petitioner’s representation dated 15.04.2026 and to conduct a preliminary enquiry into the allegations against the 5th respondent. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner, a Document Writer, filed a complaint against the Sub Registrar, Navalur / 5th respondent for failing to properly fix property values and collect the correct registration fees and stamp duties, thereby causing a great loss to the exchequer. The complaint further alleges that the SRO, Navalur, / 5th respondent registered agricultural lands as residential plots without following due procedure and thereby collecting bribe amount for the same. Despite the formal complaint, no action has been taken. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted the petitioner’s complaint was received on
16.04.2026. He further submitted that the enquiry is under progress and appropriate steps will be taken within a period of two months. 4.Considered the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1040 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
5. In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate, this Court directs the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 15.04.2026 and conduct a preliminary enquiry in accordance with the law.
Such exercise shall be completed within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With the above directions, this Petition is disposed of. No costs. 30-04-2026 ep To
1. The Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Alandur, Chennai-600 016. 2. The Deputy Superintend of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chengalpattu-603 001. 3. The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chengalpattu-603 001. 4. The Inspector General of Registration No.100, Snathome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028. 5. Nepoleon The Sub Registrar, Navalur, Chengalpattu District. 6. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1040 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. ep WP Crl. No. 1040 of 2026 30-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis