Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6267 (PNJ)

(O&M) UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS v. PURAN SINGH

FAO/2309/1998 · 2026-02-18

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-230 119 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Union of India and another Puran Singh (since deceased) through LRs and others CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) and another Vs. Bahadur Singh and another even date. 18.02.2026 sanjay 2309-1998 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** FAO XOBJC Date of Decision: 18.02.2026 Union of India and another Versus Puran Singh (since deceased) through LRs others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Ms. Gehna Vaishnavi, Advocate for the appellant-UOI. Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate and Mr. K.P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the respondents/ landowners. --- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For orders, see RFA-2305 and another Vs. Bahadur Singh and another even date. 18.02.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2309-1998 (O&M) with XOBJC-6-CII-1999 Date of Decision: 18.02.2026 …..Appellants Puran Singh (since deceased) through LRs ..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Gehna Vaishnavi, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate and Mr. K.P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the respondents/ landowners. 2305-1998, titled as Union of India and another Vs. Bahadur Singh and another, decided vide order of (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No Union of India , decided vide order of (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.02.23 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document