[2026:RJ-JP:16347] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5409/2026 Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Bharatlal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gadhi, P.s. Balghat, District Karauli (Raj.) (Presently In Sub Jail At Hindaun, District Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Sharma Mr. Akshat Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Suresh Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 17/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.110/2025 registered at Police Station Balghat, Distt. Karauli for offence under Sections 189(2) and 103(1) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though name of the petitioner has been mentioned in the FIR but there is no specific role attributed to him and as per the charge- sheet, it is principal offender Shivram Meena against whom the specific act for causing fatal injuries to deceased has been assigned. He argued that a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide [2026:RJ-JP:16347] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5409/2026] order dated 17.03.2026 while granting bail to Sher Singh has observed that investigation has not been conducted failry in the present case and has directed the Superintendent of Police to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the I.O. of this case. It is contended that case of the present petitioner is akin to that of co- accused Sher Singh. The petitioner is behind the bars since 14.07.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required, hence on the ground of parity, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Bharatlal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J BRIJ MOHAN GANDHI /77