Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6261 (CHH)

JAIDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/978/2026 · 2026-04-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15938-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 978 of 2026 Jaideep Singh S/o Lt. Malkit Singh Aged About 36 Years Resident of Shastri Nagar Near Bhaskar Hospital Karm Chari Nagar, Rampur, District- Bareily (U.P.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Police Station Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - T.S. Pattavi Nayapara Santoshi Mandir Chowk, Sirgitti Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Hemlata Yadav W/o Late Rakesh Kumar Yadav Aged About 24 Years R/o Ram Rani Bada Jagmal Chowk, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Palash Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Deputy Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08.04.2026 1. Heard Mr. Palash Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No.1. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned F.I.R. bearing No. 630/2023 dated 16.12.2023, registered at Police ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2026.04.09 10:23:33 +0530 2 Station Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 3. Learned State counsel submits that in the present case, the charge- sheet has already been filed and the petitioner has been shown as an absconder, and proceedings have been initiated under Section 299 of the CrPC. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge-sheet and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, in accordance with law. 5. In view of the submission so made, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedies as may be available under law. 7. Certified copies of the documents annexed to the petition, if any, shall be returned to learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining photocopies thereof on record, subject to deposit of the aforesaid costs. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu