SAPOI TEA COMPANY LIMITED v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
WP(C)/1478/2026 · 2026-05-17
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6259 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6259 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010051582026
2026:GAU-AS:6824
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1478/2026 SAPOI TEA COMPANY LIMITED A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF COMPANIES ACT 1913 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 13-A, DACRES LANE, 7TH FLOOR, KOLKATA - 700069, AND ITS TEA ESTATE KNOWN AS SAPOI TEA ESTATE (D-084), P.O.- DARRANG PANBARI, DISTRICT- SONITPUR, ASSAM- 784110,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SHRI KESHAV KANOI, S/O- SHRI PAVAN KANOI, R/O- 13-A, DAVRES LANE, 7TH FLOOR, KOLKATA-70069 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, LABOUR WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 781006 2:THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ASSAM TEA EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (ATEPFO) NIDHI BHAWAN BASISTHA LALMATI N.H. - 37 GUWAHATI - 781029 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-CUM-P.F. COMMISSIONER.
3:THE SECRETARY -CUM- P.F COMMISSIONER ASSAM TEA EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION NIDHI BHAWAN BASISTHA LALMATI
Page No.# 2/3 NH-37 GUWAHATI-781029 4:THE ADDITIONAL P.F COMMISSIONER ASSAM TEA EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION NIDHI BHAWAN BASISTHA LALMATI N.H. - 37 GUWAHATI-781029 5:THE RECOVERY OFFICER ASSAM TEA EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION TEZPUR ZONAL OFFICE NIDHI BHAWAN NIKAMUL SATRA MAZGAON TEZPUR DISTRICT- SONITPUR ASSAM -78415 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. Baruah, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. Patiri, Standing Counsel
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 18.05.2026
Mr. N. Baruah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner further submitted that the writ petition has various formal defects. In addition to that, various necessary pleadings have not been incorporated.
Page No.# 3/3
3. This Court has also taken note of that till date, no affidavit- in-opposition has been filed by the Respondents.
4. Considering the above, this Court closes the instant writ petition on withdrawal.
5. Liberty is given to the Petitioner to re-file by removing those formal defects.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant