Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6258 (CHH)

SATO BAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4538/2021 · 2026-04-12

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16884 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4538 of 2021 1 - Sato Bai W/o Late Kartik Ram Aged About 63 Years Resident Of Village Kalari, Tahsil Arang , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Jagtaran S/o Kangalu Aged About 70 Years Resident Of Village Kalari, Tahsil Arang , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sonu S/o Bau Aged About 45 Years Resident Of Village Kalari, Tahsil Arang , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Meghnath S/o Late Tejram Aged About 60 Years Resident Of Village Kalari, Tahsil Arang , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Kamla Bai W/o Late Shri Radhelal Aged About 60 Years Resident Of Village Kalari, Tahsil Arang , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Satvati W/o Hari Vishal Aged About 50 Years Resident Of Village Kalari, Tahsil Arang , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Ramlal S/o Gore Aged About 40 Years Resident Of Village Kalari, Tahsil Arang , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Revenue , Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur , Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Arang District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 4 - Forest Range Officer Range Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Gram Panchayat Kalai, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 13/04/2026 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner even when the matter is taken up for hearing twice. 2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge