RAVITABEN GANABHAI PARGI v. CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME OFFICER
SCA/18005/2018 · 2026-02-02
Maulik J Shelat
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6254 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6254 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18005 of 2018 ============================================= RAVITABEN GANABHAI PARGI Versus CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME OFFICER & ORS. ============================================= Appearance: MR MM TIRMIZI(1117) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR A A ZABUAWALA(6823) for the Respondent(s) No. 3 MR. NISARG N JAIN(8807) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MS NIDHI VYAS, AGP for Respondent No.1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ============================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT
Date : 02/02/2026 ORAL ORDER
1. Heard Mr.M.M.Tirmizi, learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr.Nisarg Jain, learned advocate for respondent No.2 and Ms.Nishi Vyas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1.
2. After arguing for some time, under the instructions of his client, Mr.Tirmizi, learned advocate for the petitioner does not press the present petition with liberty to make an appropriate detailed representation to respondent No.2 in regard to wrong appointment of respondent No.3 herein, as, according to the petitioner, respondent No.3 was not the resident of Tadgam Faliyu as per the advertisement in question, but was the resident of Talav Faliyu. 2.1 It is further the grievance of the petitioner that instead of running the Aanganwadi at Tadgam Faliyu as per the p. 1 advertisement, due to the in昀氀uence of respondent No.3, it was shifted to Talav Faliyu.
3. Permission, as sought for, is granted.
4. It is hereby open for the petitioner to make a suitable representation raising her grievance with supporting documentary evidence to respondent No.2. Let such representation shall be 昀椀led by the petitioner within one month from today. If such representation will be received by respondent No.2 on or before 02.03.2026, respondent No.2 is hereby directed to decide such representation, in accordance with law, by a昀昀ording an opportunity to respondent No.3 in a case where any adverse order shall be taken against her. Such exercise shall be completed by respondent No.2 on or before
30.04.2026.
5. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of, as not pressed. Notice is discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(MAULIK J. SHELAT, J) GAURAV J THAKER p. 2 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: GAURAVKUMAR JANARDANBHAI THAKER(HC00951), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 02/02/2026 15:34:19