Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 62532 (MAD)

B.CHANDRASEKARAN v. The District collector

WP/32286/2026 · 2026-08-13

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 32286 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 32286 of 2026 B.Chandrasekaran ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector, Office of the District collectorate, fort Main Road, Salem District. 2. The Revenue Divisional office, Attur Taluk, Salem. 3. Thasildar, Attur Taluk, Salem District. 4. Village Administration officer, Narasingapuram village, Attur Taluk, Salem. 5. Ramu 6. Kalaivani ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 8.6.2026 which has been taken on file and registered as petition No.NA/2068/2026/m4 and pass appropriate orders, by conducting a proper enquiry and passing appropriate orders thereon including cancellation of the patta transfer entered in patta https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32286 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 No.1269 dated 19.1.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Balaji For Respondent(s): Ms.A.Bakkiya Lakshmi, Additional Government Pleader for R1 to 4 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 08.06.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 08.06.2026 before the respondents 1 to 4 to cancel the fraudulent patta issued in favour of fifth respondent and the subsequent settlement deed executed in favour sixth respondent. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Ms.A.Bakkiya Lakshmi, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4 and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 08.06.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32286 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 08.06.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 5 & 6 and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 13-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32286 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM To: 1. The District collector, Office of the District collectorate, fort Main Road, Salem District. 2. The Revenue Divisional office, Attur Taluk, Salem. 3. Thasildar, Attur Taluk, Salem District. 4. Village Administration officer, Narasingapuram village, Attur Taluk, Salem. WP No. 32286 of 2026 13-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis