Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6253 (GAU)

ON THE DEATH OF SRI BABBAN DUBEY HIS LEGAL HEIRS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 4 ORS.

WP(C)/1697/2017 · 2026-05-12

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010016602017 2026:GAU-AS:6569 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1697/2017 ON THE DEATH OF SRI BABBAN DUBEY HIS LEGAL HEIRS 1.1) SRI ABHAY KUMAR DUBEY, AGED 43 YEARS, SON OF LATE BABBAN DUBEY, RESIDENT OF P.N. ROAD, SANTIPARA, P.O., P.S. DISTRICT- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 1.2: SRI BINAY SARMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS SON OF LATE BABBAN DUBEY RESIDENT OF DEMOW JYOTI NAGAR P.O. AND P.S. DEMOW DISTRICT - SIVASAGAR ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUESETTLEMENT AND DM DEPT, DISPUR, GAUHATI-06, ASSAM 2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE SETTLEMENT AND D.M. DEPARTMENT DISPUR GAUHATI-06 ASSAM 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SIVASAGAR DIST.-SIVASAGAR ASSAM PIN-785640 4:THE ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SIVASAGAR Page No.# 2/3 DIST. SIVASGAR ASSAM PIN-785640 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DEMOW REVENUE CIRCLE DEMOW SIVASAGAR PIN-785662 6:SRI AJAY DUBEY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SON OF LATE BABBAN DUBEY RESIDENTS OF BHITHI SAHABUDDIN P.O. BHITHI SAHABUDDIN P.S. BANIAPUR DISTRICT- CHAPRA BIHAR PIN-841411. 7:SRI BIJAY DUBEY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS SON OF LATE BABBAN DUBEY RESIDENT OF WARD DEMOW JYOTI NAGAR P.O. AND P.S. DEMOW DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR ASSAM 8:SMT. BIVA PANDEY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE BABBAN DUBEY RESIDENTS OF SMQ 376/G1 CAMRO COMPLEX SUBROTO PARK NEW DELHI-110010 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.P J SAIKIA, MR.K BARUAH,MR.R S MISHRA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 13.05.2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. Mr. H. Sharma, learned Government Advocate is present. It appears that on the last occasion, i.e., 31.03.2026 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the consecutive non appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant