Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6252 (PNJ)

GAGANDEEP SINGH v. MR. MANPREET SINGH, BDPO, BUDHLADA

COCP/210/2026 · 2026-03-30

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-210 IN THE HI 288 Gagandeep S Mr. Manpree CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW Punjab and o 2. of the compl Manpreet Si himself has g 210-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o deep Singh Versus anpreet Singh, BDPO, Budhlada M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. JS Khiva, Advocate for the Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 10.11.2025 (Annex CWP-31693-2025, titled as ‘Ga and others’ whereby it was directed a “xxx xxx 3. At this stage, learned S from Mr. Manpreet Singh, Panchayat Officer, Budhlada, the necessary steps for repa drainage system by laying do discharge of water, would be c four weeks from today.” Learned counsel for the respond compliance report dated 24.03.2026 fi reet Singh, BDPO, Budhlada, District lf has given statement Annexure R-1/T “In compliance with the orders 31693 of 2025 and COCP [n original, but corrected to 210 the marriage of Gagandeep Sin been laid in front of the main g ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-210-2026 Date of Decision: 30.03.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA the petitioner. AAG, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-5) passed by the Writ Gagandeep Singh vs. State of ected as under:- xxx ed State counsel, on instructions ngh, Block Development and da, District Mansa, submits that repairing and maintaining the down underground pipeline for be carried out within a period of espondent-State refers to para No. 7 026 filed by way of affidavit of Sh. istrict Mansa, wherein the petitioner 1/T, which reads as follows:- ders of the Hon’ble Court in CWP [noted as 2382 of 2026 in the 210 of 2026 herein], considering p Singh, a temporary pipeline has ain gate of his house on the Aanaj ging Writ e of ns nd at he or of o. 7 Sh. oner P he ng as aj RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.01 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-210 3. Annexure R 4. taken on reco for the petiti 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. 8. 30.03.2026 rishu 210-2026 -2- Mandi side to open the path an water. Gagandeep Singh son o Ralli, has expressed his consen February, he will remove the t expense and construct a ramp cost....” Learned counsel for the State ure R-2 to submit that necessary repai Compliance report dated 24.03. on record. A copy thereof, has also bee petitioner. Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable th and facilitate drainage of dirty on of Rajinder Singh, resident of nsent that after the wedding, by 15 the temporary pipeline at his own mp and drainage nala at his own State further refers to photographs repair work has been carried out. 24.03.2026 handed over in Court is been supplied to learned counsel above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No rty of 15 wn n aphs is nsel are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.01 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.