Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6252 (CHH)

ASHA JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1616/2023 · 2026-04-08

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16277 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1616 of 2023 Asha Jaiswal W/o Dheerendra Jaiswal Aged About 48 Years R/o Behind District And Sessions Court Ambikapur, P.S. Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Law And Legislative Affairs Department, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Chhattisgarh State Legal Service Authority Bilaspur, Office At Old High Court Building Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Secretary District Legal Service Authority, Surguja Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Shri Jai Prakash Gupta (Advocate) Chief Legal Aid Defense Counsel Dlsa Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Shri Dileep Singh (Advocate) Deputy Chief Legal Aid Defense Counsel Dlsa Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Nishi Kant Sinha, Advocate. For State/Respondent: Shri Sangharsh Pandey, GA. For Respondent : Shri Utsav Mahiswar appears on behalf of Ms. AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.04.16 10:41:49 +0530 2 Nos.2 & 3 Shailja Shukla, Advocates. For Respondent No.5 : Shri Krishna Kant Prajapati appears on behalf of Shri DN Prajapati, Advocates. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/04/2026 1. The petitioner by way of this Writ Petition challenges the appointment of Respondent No.4 & 5 as Chief Legal Aid Defense Counsel and Deputy Chief Legal Aid Defense Counsel respectively made by Respondent No.2 vide order dated 10.01.2023 (Annexure P/1). 2. The petitioner prayed for the following reliefs:- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and the impugned order dated 10/01/2023 passed by the respondent no. 2, placed as (Annexure P-1) may kindly be quashed so far it relates to the appointment of respondent no. 4 & 5 as Chief Legal Aid Defense Counsel & Deputy Chief Legal Aid Defense Counsel at DLSA Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G). 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and petitioner may be appointed as Chief Legal Aid Defense Counsel or Deputy Chief Legal Aid Defense Counsel at DLSA Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G). 10.3 That this Honble Court my kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to re-appoint an appropriate candidate having fulfilling the requisite criteria after following the due process of appointment as per the Advertisement dated 24.08.2022 issued by respondent authorities in the larger interest of justic. 3 10.4 Any other relief (s) that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of this case. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash