IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24131 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-512 Year-2025 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Rajesh Kumar Surendra Kahar R/o Village - Purni Saraiya, P.S. - Paliganj, Dist. - Patna. 2. Ramesh Kumar S/o Surendra Kahar R/o Village - Purni Saraiya, P.S. - Paliganj, Dist. - Patna. 3. Rahul Kumar Son of Surendra Kahar R/o Village - Purni Saraiya, P.S. - Paliganj, Dist. - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Niwas Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2026 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Mainatand Police Station Case No. 221 of 2025, disclosing offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 74, 79, 303(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. As per the FIR, on 21.10.2025 at about 09:00 P.M., the FIR named accused persons were busting firecrackers at temple near the house of informant. When the informant objected, the accused persons started abusing her and assaulted on her neck with sharp weapon and caused injury on her neck. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24131 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 The informant got three stitches in her neck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. There is no direct and specific allegation of assault against the petitioners. Compromise has taken place between the parties for which a joint compromise petition is filed before learned court below. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned APP has opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that the injuries sustained by the informant in the neck is found to be grievous. 6. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioners and the fact that injuries are found to be grievous in nature, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. Ranjeet/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T