SANJAY YADAV SON OF LAL SINGH YADAV v. CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
CW/20737/2025 · 2026-03-16
Nupur Bhati
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 625 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 625 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11051] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20737/2025 Sanjay Yadav Son Of Lal Singh Yadav, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of House No. 17, Suraj Nagar, Milakpuri, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Chairman And Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House Circle, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.
2. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Tijara Depot. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.K. Saini. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankar.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order 16/03/2026
1. Mr. Rajpal Dhankar appears for the respondents upon receipt of advance copy.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that since, the issue involved in the instant writ petition has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Dauji Prasad & Ors. Vs. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14614/2024) decided on 30.10.2025, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit representation.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents is in agreement with the
submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
[2026:RJ-JP:11051] (2 of 2) [CW-20737/2025]
4. In view of limited prayer, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit representation before the respondents and in case, after examining the representation, the respondents find that case of the petitioner is also covered by the judgments in the case of Dauji Prasad (supra) as well as Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation(S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8810/2014) decided on25.01.2017, referred in the order dated 30.10.2025, then similar benefits shall be granted to the petitioner.
5. Necessary exercise shall be carried out within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
7. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(DR.NUPUR BHATI),J 11-pradeep/-