M/s.Sri Rajalakshmi Packaging v. The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise
WP/30182/2026 · 2026-08-13
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 62483 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 62483 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 30182 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 30182 of 2026 and WMP.No.33134 of 2026 M/s. Sri Rajalakshmi Packaging GSTIN : 34AAWFS6365C1ZT Represented by its Authorized Signatory N. Saravanan, Managing Partner, R.S. No. 141/7, Sulthanpet, Puducherry - 605 110. ..Petitioner Vs The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise Range II-D, No.14, 4th Floor, Municipal Street, Reddiarpalayam, Puducherry-605 010. ..Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records of the Respondent and quash the Impugned Order for Cancellation of Registration dated 27.04.2026 in Form GST REG-19 bearing Ref. No. ZA3404260063313 passed by the Respondent and consequently restore Petitioner’s Registration bearing GSTIN : 34AAWFS6365C1ZT. For Petitioner: Mr. Bharath R Srinivas For Respondent: Mr. R.P.Pragadish, Senior Standing Counsel Mr. J. Harikrishna, Junior Standing Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30182 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 ORDER The petitioner challenges an order of cancellation of GST registration. The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing boxes and was a registered person under applicable GST laws. Pursuant to a show cause notice dated 22.09.2025 stating that the petitioner had not filed GST monthly returns regularly, the impugned order was issued. According to the petitioner, he was facing several administrative difficulties and shortage of staff and therefore, he was unable to file returns regularly. The present writ petition was filed in the said facts and circumstances. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cancellation of the GST registration is causing immense hardship and that such cancellation should be revoked. In support of his contentions, he draws reference to the Judgment of this Court in Suguna Cutpiece v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST), W.P.Nos.25048 of 2021 batch (Suguna Cutpiece). 3. Mr. R.P.Pragadish, learned Senior Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. He submits that the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled on account of the petitioner not filing returns regularly. He further submits that the order issued in Suguna Cutpiece was a conditional order and that the petitioner should be directed to comply with all conditions stipulated therein. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30182 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6
4. In Suguna Cutpiece, this Court directed restoration of GST registration subject to several terms and conditions.
The said judgment was followed thereafter in many cases. In order to maintain consistency, I am inclined to follow the said judgment. 5. In the operative portion thereof, the following directions were issued:
"i. The petitioner is directed to file her returns for the period prior to the cancellation of registration, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of forty five (45) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ii. It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine / fee and etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner. iii. If any Input Tax Credit has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or competent officer of the Department. iv. Only such approved Input Tax Credit shall be allowed to be utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules. v. The petitioner shall also pay GST and file the returns for the period subsequent to the cancellation of the registration by declaring the correct value of supplies. vi. If any Input Tax Credit was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondents or any other competent authority. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30182 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 vii. On payment of tax, penalty and uploading of returns, the registration shall stand revived forthwith. viii. The respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and to pay the tax / penalty / fine. ix.
The above exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."
6. The restoration of the GST registration is subject to and conditional upon fulfilling the above conditions. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of on the same terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 13-08-2026 Index : Yes/No (2/2) Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30182 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise Range II-D, No.14, 4th Floor, Municipal Street, Reddiarpalayam, Puducherry-605 010. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30182 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. KJ WP No. 30182 of 2026 13-08-2026 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis