PRAKASH SANGAMESHWARA MATH v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
WP/3314/2026 · 2026-03-04
Anant Ramanath Hegde
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6247 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6247 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13219 WP No. 3314 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 3314 OF 2026 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
PRAKASH SANGAMESHWARA MATH, S/O KENJEDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, TOKEN NO.4599, BMTC, 11TH DEPOT, DRIVER CUM CONDUCTOR, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHEKAR L, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHAIRMAN, INTER CORPORATION TRANSFER, KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICE, K.H. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027.
2.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BMTC, CENTRAL OFFICE, K.H.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027.
3.
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, BMTC, NORTH ZONE, CENTRAL OFFICE, K.H.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B L SANJEEV, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- DIRECT THE R1 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER REPRESENTATION DATED 08.09.2025 AS PER ANNX-F.
Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13219 WP No. 3314 of 2026
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL ORDER
Petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus against respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.09.2025.
2. In terms of the said representation, the petitioner who is the employee of the respondent-Corporation has sought transfer from BMTC, Bengaluru to NWKRTC, Dharwad. The said representation is not yet considered.
3. The petitioner claims that, his son is differently abled and for this reason he is finding it difficult to work in Bengaluru.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, a similar application under similar circumstance has been favourably considered in favour of some other employee. Therefore, the respondent authorities are under obligation to consider the said representation as the petitioner is the employee of respondent No.1.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13219 WP No. 3314 of 2026
5. Hence, the following:
ORDER (i) The Writ Petition is allowed. (ii) Respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation dated 08.09.2025 within 30 days from the date of this order. (iii) Nothing is expressed on the merits of the matter.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42