Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6246 (JHR)

ANKIT KUMAR ALIAS ANKIT KUMAR RAJ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3037/2026 · 2026-04-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:10894 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3037 of 2026 ------ Ankit Kumar @ Bandra @ Ankit Kumar Raj, aged about 19 years, Son of Pappu Yadav, resident of Sakhuwa Bagan, J.P. Market, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.- Ranchi .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr Dey, A. l P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-16-04-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Vidhan Sabha P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, attempted to murder of the informant, causing serious injury and also attempted to murder Varun, Anish and Saurabh Jha. There is further allegation that the petitioner and the co-accused person snatched away the gold chain of the informant and Rs.5000/- It is next submitted that for the selfsame occurrence, from the side of the petitioner, the mother of the petitioner lodged Vidhan Sabha P.S. Case No. 09 of 2026. It is then submitted that there was free fight between the parties. It is then submitted that the petitioner is a student. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.01.2026 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has written his intermediate examination while he is in custody. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Vidhan Sabha P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 16.04.2026 Nandini/