ANIL BABURAO VIBHUTE AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT. AND ORS.
WP/4120/2026 · 2026-09-03
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6244 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6244 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
910 wp 4210-26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4120 OF 2026 Anil Baburao Vibhute and Another. ...Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others. ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan, Ajinkya Wadekar and Atul M. Khilari for the Petitioner. Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State. ——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : September 3, 2026.
P. C. :
1.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The grievance of the Petitioner in effect is that the acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had lapsed and compensation, if any, is required to be paid under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. To seek the said relief, pleadings and prayers in the present petition are inadequate. The petition is, therefore, permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh petition seeking appropriate reliefs.
2. Petition stands disposed of. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Patil-SR 1 of
1 2026:BHC-KOL:8504-DB