APHC010089962017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3543] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 14777/2017 Between: 1. M/S. VENAKATESWARA DALL MILL, REP. BY ITS PROPRITOR MORREMSETTY VENKATA RAMUDU @VENKATARAMANAPPA SURVEY NO.389/2B, DHARMAVARAM ROAD, KOTHACHERUVU MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT - 515133 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AUDIT, ~0/O DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (CT) ANANATHAPURAMU. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER2, KADIRI UNIT, 0/O. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, DHARRNAVARM, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction or writ more so in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring (i) that the Assessment Order No.43453 dated 30.11.2015 passed by the 2nd Respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, unlawful, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the APVAT Act, 2005 and set aside the same, 2 and (ii) consequently set aside the Anantapuramu District Gazette Notification vide D.Dis.A5/1597 & 1598/2017, dated 09.03.2017 issued by the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of Article 14, 19, 21 and 265 of Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 18283 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pass an order staying all further proceedings pursuant to the Assessment Order No.43453 dated 30.11.2015 passed by the 2nd Respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to receive the counter copies on record by allowing the leave petition in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P N SUNIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX (AP) 2. SHAIK JEELANI BASHA(SPL SC FOR CT AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 14777 of 2017 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ today, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 2. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J _______________ T.C.D.SEKHAR, J GVK 4 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No. 14777/2017 Dt. 22.07.2026 GVK