Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6243 (JHR)

SACHIN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1498/2026 · 2026-04-16

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:10927 --1-- A.B.A. No. 1498 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1498 of 2026 ---- Sachin Kumar, aged about 21 years, S/o Kirani Raut, resident of village – Baijandih, PO and PS – Jarmundi, District – Dumka .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Praful Jojo, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate ---- 02/16.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jarmundi P.S. Case No.94 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 115, 117(2), 127(2), 352 and 74 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dumka. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and informant’s sides are agnates and there are land dispute between the parties and that has also been stated in the FIR itself. He further submits that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault against all the family members. He then submits that the injury is said to be simple. 2026:JHHC:10927 --2-- A.B.A. No. 1498 of 2026 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant jointly opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault are there against the petitioner. 5. From perusal of the FIR it transpires that in the FIR itself it has been disclosed that there are cases between them and it has been pointed out that the petitioner and informant’s sides are agnates and the injury is said to be simple and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 16.04.2026 Sangam/