Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 62425 (MAD)

Aravinth v. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. through The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/21293/2026 · 2026-08-05

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 21293 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 21293 of 2026 Aravinth ..Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. through The Inspector of Police, Thittakudi AWPS, Cuddalore District. Crime No.16/2026 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the Petitioner/Accused in Crime No.16 of 2026 pending on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Radha Pandian For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 16.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 6 and 8 of POCSO Act, in Crime No.16 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had sexually harassed the minor victim boy. Hence the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21293 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is a huge delay in the registration of the complaint, as the alleged occurrence took place on 22.04.2026, whereas the present complaint came to be registered only on 16.05.2026. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 16.05.2026 and is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that the statement of the victim under Section 183 of BNSS has been recorded. 5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side. 6. On perusing the statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, it is observed that there are serious allegations against the petitioner. Though the charge sheet has been filed, considering the totality of the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21293 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 05-08-2026 NSL To 1. The Inspector of Police, Thittakudi AWPS, Cuddalore District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21293 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. NSL CRL OP No. 21293 of 2026 05-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis