Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6242 (GAU)

RANI PUKHURI GAON PANCHAYAT v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/2468/2026 · 2026-05-19

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010087062026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2468/2026 RANI PUKHURI GAON PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI NABIN CHANDRA DAS, 48 YEAR, S/O-LATE JATINDRA KUMAR DAS, OFFICE ADDRESS- RANI PUKHURI, P.O.- BHALUKMARI, P.S.-LANKA, DISTRICT-HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN-782442. RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS- VILLAGE JARSAGAR, P.O. AZARBARI, P.S. KAKI, DISTRICT- HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN- 782442 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN-781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ASSAM JURIPAR PANJABARI ASSAM PIN-781037. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HOJAI DISTRICT SRIMANTA SANKARDEV NAGAR ASSAM PIN-782442. 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER HOJAI ZILA PARISHAD SRIMANTA SANKARDEV NAGAR DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM PIN-782442. Page No.# 2/3 5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER UDALI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK BAMUNGAON P.O.- BAMUNGAON P.S.- LANKA DISTRICT- HOJAI ASSAM PIN-78244 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAUHAN, MR. P MAZUMDER,M. BORUAH,B CHOWHAN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 20-05-2026 Mr. S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance raised in the writ petition has been redressed and in such view of the matter, the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition. Ms. P. Thapa, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat and Rural Development Department and Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant