Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:15553] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5622/2026 Insaf @ Tala S/o Islam Shah, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Hemnagar Bhatta Basti Kekri, Police Station Kekri City, District Ajmer (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Wahid Naqvi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 15/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.504/2024 registered at Police Station Kekri City, District Kekri for offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioner pertains to the commission of theft in the house of the complainant. Co-accused, namely Imran, Farukh @ Kalu @ Mustak, have already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court. The petitioner has been in custody since 11.09.2025. Though as many as 17 cases have been registered against the petitioner but he has been
[2026:RJ-JP:15553] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5622/2026] acquitted in four cases, and in the remaining cases, he has been granted bail. The charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner-Insaf @ Tala S/o Islam Shah be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) That during the conclusion of the trial, the petitioner “shall not enter or reside within the jurisdiction of the district where the case is pending except for attending Court proceeding and that too with prior intimation to the Investigating Officer” and shall mark his presence before the concerned police station where he begins to reside in every 15 days of each month. [2026:RJ-JP:15553] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5622/2026] (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future.
(iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/39