EKAMBARAM v. The Land Acquisition cum District Revenue officer
WP/30699/2026 · 2026-08-05
Krishnan Ramasamy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 62376 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 62376 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 30699 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 30699 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 33717 OF 2026
1. Ekambaram S/o.Munusamy Reddy Kayalarmedu Village, Chinna Obalappuram Madura, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District. 2. Kasiammal w/o.Ekambaram, Kayalarmedu Village, Chinna Obalappuram Madura, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District. 3. Rajesh S/o.Sekar, Kayalarmedu Village, Chinna Obalappuram Madura, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District. 4. S.Padmanabhan S/o.Sivalinga Reddiar, Kayalarmedu Village, Chinna Obalappuram Madura, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District. 5. Ellappan S/o.Gangadara Reddy, No.2/39, L R Medu, Arambakkam, Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District. ..Petitioner(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30699 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 Vs The Land Acquisition cum District Revenue officer, Thiruvallur Collectorate, Thiruvallur 602 001 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent its men, agents and subordinates from proceeding further with the land acquisition proceedings initiated against the petitioners lands in Chinna Obalapuram Village Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District without conducting proper enquiry and considering the petitioners objections submitted pursuant to the notice vide Na.Ka. No.5784/ 2024/ F2 dated 20.02.2026 and adjudicated upon by passing a reasoned order as the same is in violation of the provisions of Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial purposes Act, 1997 and therefore unconstitutional, arbitrary, ultra vires, patently illegal For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Jaya Surya, for Mr.N .R.Anantha Rama Krishnan For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Sivavarthanan, SGP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30699 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 Order This writ petition has been filed to restrain the respondents from proceeding with the acquisition process by considering the petitioner’s objection dated 20.03.2026. 2. Mr.M.Sivavarthanan, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up disposal at the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that in this case, a notification under Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, was issued on 20.02.2026 for acquisition of subject land. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an objection dated
20.03.2026. However, the said objection was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. 5.
In reply, the learned counsel appearing for respondents would submit that in this case, subsequent to the issuance of Section 3(2) notification, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30699 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 enquiry was conducted, in which the petitioner had also participated. Further, he would submit that if they intend to issue subsequent notice under Section 3(1), they will certainly consider the objection filed by the petitioner. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In the case on hand, a notification under Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, was issued on 20.02.2026 for acquisition of subject land, against which, the petitioner filed an objection dated 20.03.2026. According to the petitioner, the said objection was not at all considered by the respondents till date. 8. On the other hand, today, it was submitted by the respondents, subsequent to the issuance of Section 3(2) notification, enquiry was conducted, in which the petitioner had also participated. Further, they assured that the official respondents will certainly consider the petitioner’s objection, if they intend to issue any subsequent notice under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30699 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6
9. In view of the above, this Court directs the respondent to consider the petitioner’s objection and thereafter, proceed with the issuance of Section 3(1) Notification, if they intend to do so. 10. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 05-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To The Land Acquisition cum District Revenue officer Thiruvallur Collectorate, Thiruvallur 602 001 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 30699 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 30699 of 2026 05-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis