Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6236 (JHR)

MAHADEO YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/255/2026 · 2026-04-16

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:10889 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 255 of 2026 -- 1) Mahadeo Yadav (Age about 67 years) S/o Sri Karu Yadav resident of Srikant Road, Belabagan, Ward No. 14, Near Old Police Line, Deoghar, P.O & P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar (Jharkhand) 2) Abhimanyu Singh @ Abhimanyu Singh Yadav (Age about 66 years) S/o Late Rajkishore Singh resident of Tajpur Kurrah, P.O.- Gajpur Kurrah, P.S.- Dildar Nagar, District- Gajipur (Uttar Pradesh). .......Petitioners -VERSUS- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Mukesh Kumar, the Superintendent of Police, Godda, P.O. & P.S.- Godda, District Godda (Jharkhand). 3. Sri Amit Kumar Singh, the Superintendent of Police, Sahebganj, P.O & P.S.- Sahebganj, District Sahebganj (Jharkhand) ....Opposite parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Verma, Advocate For the O.P.-State : Mr. Saurav Mahto, A.C to G.P.-I -- 02/16.04.2026 Having regard to the averments and Annexure- A to show cause, no contempt is made out. 2. Accordingly, the instant contempt application stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the reasoned order, if so advised. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 16th April, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 18/04/2026