Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010053632026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/920/2026 AJIT BAISHYA S/O LATE KARTIK CH. BAISHYA, R/O HOUSE NO.-29, GANDHIBASTI, NATUN SARANIA, P.O AND P.S.- CHANDMARI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781003 VERSUS M/S D.S. POULTRY AND 2 ORS. BEZERA, P.O.- BEZERA, P.S.- BAIHATA CHARIALI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781121 (REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR SRI DIPANKAR TALUKDAR) 2:DIPANKAR TALUKDAR S/O ARUN CHANDRA TALUKDAR PROPRIETOR OF M/S D.S. POULTRY R/O VILLAGE- BHOMOLHATI P.O.- BHOMOLHATI P.S.- BAIHATA CHARIALI DISTRICT- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781121 3:SHYAMANTA TALUKDAR S/O ARUN CHANDRA TALUKDAR PROPRIETOR OF M/S D.S. POULTRY R/O VILLAGE- BHOMOLHATI P.O.- BHOMOLHATI P.S.- BAIHATA CHARIALI DISTRICT- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-78112 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N N UPADHYAYA, MR. S UPADHAYA,MR. B B KAKATI,MR. B D CHOWDHURY Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : ITREF(A)/0/0 SRI AJIT BAISHYA S/O LATE KARTIK CH. BAISHYAR/O HOUSE NO.-29 GANDHIBASTI NATUN SARANIA P.O AND P.S.-CHANDMARI DISTRICT-KAMRUP M ASSAM PIN-781003 VERSUS MS DS POULTRY BEZERA P.O.-BEZERA P.S.-BAIHATA CHARIALI DISTRICT-KAMRUP PIN-781121REPRESENTED ASSAM BYPROPRIETOR SRI DIPANKAR TALUKDAR 2:DIPANKAR TALUKDAR S/O ARUN CHANDRATALUKDAR PROPRIETOR OF M/S D.S.POULTRYR/O VILLAGE- BHOMOLHATI P.O.- BHOMOLHATI P.S.-BAIHATA CHARIALI DISTRICT-KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781121 3:SHYAMANTA TALUKDAR S/O ARUN CHANDRA TALUKDAR R/O VILLAGE-BHOMOLHATI P.S.-BAIHATA CHARIALI DISTRICT-KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781121 ------------ Advocate for : MR BIDYUT BIKASH KAKATI Advocate for : appearing for MS DS POULTRY Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date - 21.05.2026 1. Heard Mr. B. B. Kakati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. B. B. Kakati, the learned counsel for the applicants. 2. On perusal of the office note dated 18.05.2026, it appears that the notice issued to the respondent No.1 by speed post was duly served on him. The service of notice on all the respondents is complete. 3. This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicants under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1963, praying for condonation of delay of 17 days in preferring the connected Regular First Appeal, whereby the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2025 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Kamrup in Money Suit No. 1/2024 has been impugned. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant has stated the cause of delay in Paragraph No. 2 of the instant Interlocutory Application. 5. After going through the same, this Court is of the opinion that the same may be considered as sufficient cause which prevented the applicant in preferring the connected appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. 6. Accordingly, the delay of 17 days in the connected appeal is hereby, condoned and this Interlocutory Application is, allowed. Page No.# 4/4 7. The Registry is directed to register the connected Regular First Appeal and list the same after one week on a date to be fixed by the Registry. JUDGE Comparing Assistant