Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 62250 (MAD)

Saravanakumar v. The State of Tamilnadu rep by

CRL OP(MD)/18059/2026 · 2026-08-20

K Murali Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.18059 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/08/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.18059 of 2026 Saravanakumar, S/o.Velusamy, No.19/1, Middle Street, Chinnamalai Kundru, Ettayapuram Taluk, Thoothukudi District.. ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Ettayapuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No.101 of 2025). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vivek Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-6. To enlarge the petitioner/Sole Accused on bail in connection with the case in S.C.No.94 of 2026 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi. 1/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18059 of 2026 ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.01.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 103(1), 131 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023, in S.C.No.94 of 2026 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi in connection with Crime No.101 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.It is not in dispute that since the petitioner has not turned up for the hearing on 28.11.2025, NBW was ordered to be issued and the same was executed and the petitioner was arrested on 15.01.2026 and he is still in judicial custody. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that when the case was pending before the committal Court, the petitioner has not turned up for the hearing on 28.11.2025 and hence, NBW came to be issued and the same was executed and the petitioner was arrested on 15.01.2026 and he is still in judicial custody. He would further submit that the NBW was issued against him for the first time. Hence, he prayed 2/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18059 of 2026 to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the case in S.C.No.94 of 2026 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi, is pending trial. He would further submit that the petitioner is involved in 3 previous cases registered under Section 506(ii) of IPC. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances and also the facts that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 15.01.2026; that NBW was issued against the petitioner for the first time and that the case in S.C.No. 94 of 2026 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi is pending trial, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction 3/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18059 of 2026 of the learned Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi, and on further conditions that; (a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioner shall report before the learned Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi, daily at 10.30 a.m., on all working days, until further orders; (c)the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; 4/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18059 of 2026 (f)if the accused / petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC. (K M S J) 20.08.2026 VSG TO 1.The learned Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi. 2.The Superintendent, District Jail, Perurani, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Ettayapuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18059 of 2026 K.MURALI SHANKAR,J., vsg ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.18059 of 2026 Date : 20/08/2026 6/6