Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6225 (RAJ)

NAVEEN S/O SHRI RAMSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13209/2025 · 2026-04-15

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15634] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13209/2025 Naveen S/o Shri Ramsingh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Seetsar, Police Station Sadar Jhunjhunu, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 15/04/2026 1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0086/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu, for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 127(2), 115(2) and 324(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the injuries sustained by the injured person are neither fatal nor dangerous to life. He further submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. He submits that injuries sustained by the injured are not attributed to petitioner. He submits that co-accused Ankit Repswal S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, has been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.06.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6991/2025 and conclusion of trial may take [2026:RJ-JP:15634] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13209/2025] long time, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by accused-petitioner hereinabove. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that petitioner is not named in the FIR; injuries sustained by the injured are not attributed to petitioner; co-accused Ankit Repswal S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, has been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.06.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6991/2025 and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner. 5. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of Naveen S/o Shri Ramsingh, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station in FIR No. 0086/2025 on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and; [2026:RJ-JP:15634] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13209/2025] (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA /54