Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6224 (GAU)

THE MANAGEMENT OF MAHAKALI TEA ESTATE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Civil)/1501/2026 · 2026-05-14

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010078222026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1501/2026 THE MANAGEMENT OF MAHAKALI TEA ESTATE P.O.- HOOGRIJAN, DISTRICTTINSUKIA, ASSAM. ONE OF THE TEA ESTATES OF M/S LUXMI TEA CO PVT. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT KISHORE BHAWAN, 17 RN MUKHERJEE ROAD, KOLKATTA- 1 REPRESENTED BY ITS GROUP HEAD - LEGAL COMPANY SECRETARY MS. KALYANI BHOWMICK, D/O ASHIM BHOWMICK, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS VERSUS 1: THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, LABOUR WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI - 06. 2:THE ASSTT LABOUR COMMISSIONER TINSUKIA DISTRICT- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125 3:THE SECRETARY ASSAM CHAH KARAMCHARI SANGHA TINGRI CIRCLE BORDOBI P.O.- HOOGRIJAN DISTRICTTINSUKIA ASSAM For the Applicant(s) : Mr. K Das, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : – B E F O R E – HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH -ORDER- 15.05.2026 Heard Mr. K Das, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. [2] The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submitted that in view of the order passed on 13.05.2026 in WP(C) 2476/2026, there Page No.# 2/2 would be no necessary seeking clarification to the order dated 19.09.2022 in WP(C) 5586/2021. [3] Taking into account the above, the instant application stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant