Anita Mahajan vs. Subhash Chand & Ors. CMP(M) No.293 of 2026 08.04.2026 Present: Ms. Reeta Hingmang, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Arun Raj, Advocate, for respondents No.2(a) to 2(d), 9 and 10. Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.6, 7, 8, 11 and 12. Reply on behalf of respondents No.2 ((a) to 2(d), 9 and 10 has been filed. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.6, 7, 8, 11 and 12 has stated that the said respondents do not want to file reply. His statement is taken on record. In view of no objection made by learned counsel appearing for the non-applicants/respondents, the delay in filing the civil revision is ordered to be condoned. The application stands disposed of. Civil Revision No……….of 2026 Vide order of even date, passed in CMP(M) No. 293 of 2026, delay in filing the civil revision has been ordered to be condoned. Be registered. Service is complete. Call for the record. CMPST No.9320 of 2026 With the efflux of time, the present application has become infructuous and the same is accordingly disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge April 08, 2026 (subhash)