Shaik Khadar Basha v. Kandagaddala Indira Bharathi
CRP/1017/2026 · 2026-04-09
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 622 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 622 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010170302026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1017/2026 Between:
1. SHAIK KHADAR BASHA, S/O. MEERA MOHIDDIN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. ISLAMPETA, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT..
...PETITIONER AND
1. KANDAGADDALA INDIRA BHARATHI, W/O. VENKATA SUBRAHMANYAM, R/O. BHAGYANAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. JOOPALLI PRABHAKAR RAO, S/O. VEERA MOHAN RAO, R/O.
DOOR NO- 411, 5TH LANE, KOPPOLU ROAD INDIRAMMA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the C.R.P. by setting aside the Order, dated 26-02- 2026 made in E.A No.205/2025 in E.P No. 60 of 2024 in O.S.No.506/2015 on the file of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ongole.
IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P No. 60/2024 in OS No. 506/2025 on the file of Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division):: Ongole, Prakasam
2
District, Andhra Pradesh pending disposal of the above revision petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ANANDA KUMAR VEJANDLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1017/2026
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing the Civil Revision Petition, both the parties compromised. As such, no further orders are necessary and requested permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.
3. Permission as sought for is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 10.04.2026 TTPPSS
4
60 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1017/2026
10.04.2026 TTPPSS