Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6217 (CAL)

LAXMI TANTIA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

CRM (SB)/128/2022 · 2026-02-25

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.02.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.16 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. C.R.M. (SB) 128 of 2022 With CRAN 1 of 2022 In Re : An Application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. And In Re : Laxmi Tantia ... Petitioner. Mr. Rudradipta Nandy … For the State. None appears for the petitioner and the private opposite parties. Mr. Nandy, learned APP represents the State. The subject-matter of challenge in the present application relates to the order of bail which was passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bidhannagar, North 24-Parganas on 20.05.2022. I have taken into account the time period which has passed in the meantime. If there has been change of circumstances, petitioner would be at liberty to first take out an application before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bidhannagar for cancellation of bail. Learned Magistrate would exercise his discretion independently without being influenced by any observations made by this Court. In view of the aforesaid directions, the application for cancellation of bail being CRM (SB) 128 of 2022 is disposed of. 2 Pending connected application is consequently disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)