[2026:RJ-JP:13167] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3966/2026 Sonu Koli Son Of Shri Shankarlal, Resident Of Deewanji Ka Bag, Near Footi Khed, Police Station Kotwali, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 1117/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Alwar District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 380 of IPC and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 457, 380, 75 of IPC dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time to conclude. It is lastly submitted that the applicant is behind bars since 10.08.2025. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application and has submitted that there [2026:RJ-JP:13167] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-3966/2026] are 21 criminal antecedents of similar nature registered against the applicant and if the applicant is enlarged on bail he will be a threat to the society. The criminal antecedents of the accused- applicant are reproduced herein below: Ø- la- ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- ua@iqfyl Fkkuk dsl ua- U;k;ky; dk uke /kkjk,a LVsVl tekur dh fnukad vkxkeh is'kh 1- 281@2012 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 2- 798@2013 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 3- 112@2014 lqHkk"k pkSd] t;iqj & & 2/25, 5/25 Arms Act & & & 4- 1229@2016 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 19/54 R.Ex. Act & & & 5- 254@2017 , u-bZ-ch- vyoj & & 523,394, 324,307, 34 I.P.C. & & & 6- 467@2011 f'kokth ikdZ] vyoj & & 454,380 I.P.C. & & & 7- 431@2010 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 8- 99@2011 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380, 436 I.P.C. & & & 9- 102@2011 vjkoyh fogkj] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 10- 31@2000 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 11- 624@2008 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380, 411,401 I.P.C. & & & 12- 591@2008 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 13- 42@2009 th- vkj-ih- vyoj & & 4/25 Arms Act & & & 14- 124@2009 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 15- 369@2009 f'kokth ikdZ] vyoj & & 341,323, 302 I.P.C. & & & [2026:RJ-JP:13167] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-3966/2026] 16- 431@2010 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 17- 151@2020 , u-bZ-ch- vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 18- 252@2020 , u-bZ-ch-] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 19- 683@2021 dksrokyh] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 20- 421@2021 vjkoyh fogkj] vyoj & & 3/25, 4/25 Arms Act & & & 21- 407@2021 , u-bZ-ch-] vyoj & & 457,380 I.P.C. & & & 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter, as per the averment made by the counsel representing him; that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time to conclude; that the applicant is behind bars ever-since 10.08.2025 and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case and taking note of the fact that there are as many as 21 criminal antecedents registered against the applicant; that the applicant is stated to be a threat to the society if he is enlarged on bail and keeping in mind the sacrosanct objective of Indian criminal reformative system and balancing the equity between right of the liberty, strong criminal antecedents and young age of applicant, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail with following conditions: 4.1 That the applicant will go for his employment/work and reside 250 kms away from the place of his current residence for a [2026:RJ-JP:13167] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-3966/2026] period of six months as the applicant is habitual to commit such offence. 4.2 That on every 5th of successive month, applicant will mark attendance before the jurisdictional police station. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Sonu Koli Son Of Shri Shankarlal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /29