Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6213 (KAR)

SMT. NAGAMMA v. SRI. P.V. SUDHAKARAN

WP/3225/2024 · 2026-02-12

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8574 WP No. 3225 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3225 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O. LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS. 2. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA D/O. LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 3. C. MUNIRAJU S/O. LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 4. C. GOWRAMMA D/O. LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 5. C. AMMAYAMMA D/O. LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 6. RUKMINI W/O. LATE SRIRAM AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 7. C. VENKATESH S/O. LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8574 WP No. 3225 of 2024 ALL THE PETITIONERS R/AT AVALAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 049. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI BABU D.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI P.V. SUDHAKARAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A. VEERENAHALLI VILLAGE OLD MADRAS ROAD VIRGONAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 049. 2. C. BHASKARAN S/O. LATE P.K.PANICKER AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.508 GARUTHAMAN PARK R.V.ROAD BANGALORE - 560 004. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 03.08.2023 IN O.S.NO.1767/2014 OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT AT BANGALORE AS STATED IN ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8574 WP No. 3225 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER The matter is called at 10.40 a.m. However, there is no representation on behalf of petitioners. 2. The matter is listed for compliance of office objections for eighth time. 3. There was no representation on the last occasion. On the previous date i.e. on 05.12.2025, this Court has passed the following order: "Matter is listed for the sixth time to comply the office objections. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. However, in the interest of justice, the matter is finally adjourned to 16.12.2025. By the next date of hearing if the office objections are not complied, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution. Re-list this matter on 16.12.2025." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8574 WP No. 3225 of 2024 Under the circumstances, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2