[2026:RJ-JP:14576] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4461/2026 Arjun @ Apple S/o Shri Vinod, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Rawasa, Police Station Jeenmata, District Sikar, (Rajasthan) (Accused Presently Confined In Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 08/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 332/2024 registered at Police Station Jobner, District Jaipur(Rural) for the offence(s) under Sections 309(4), 3(5) of BNS and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also contends that the petitioner is in custody since 04.02.2026 and recovery has already been effected. He further submits that co-accused Vikas @ Vicky, Mohd. Anees, Ramjan @ Kalu Kha Kureshi and Toshif Bahaleem have been enlarged on bail by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 05.12.2024, 07.01.2025 and 04.08.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.14148/2024, 14514/2024, 16193/2024 and 8074/2025, [2026:RJ-JP:14576] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4461/2026] co-accused-Tarachand has been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 01.04.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Third Bail Application No. 16743/2025. Conclusion of trial may take long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against accused-petitioner Arjun @ Apple S/o Shri Vinod, 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 04.02.2026; co-accused Vikas @ Vicky, Mohd. Anees, Ramjan @ Kalu Kha Kureshi and Toshif Bahaleem have been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 05.12.2024, 07.01.2025 and 04.08.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.14148/2024, 14514/2024, 16193/2024 and 8074/2025, co-accused-Tarachand has been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 01.04.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Third Bail Application No. 16743/2025 and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Arjun @ Apple S/o Shri Vinod is ordered to be released on bail, provided he [2026:RJ-JP:14576] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4461/2026] furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/51