Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6210 (UTT)

RITIK VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/455/2026 · 2026-05-30

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21. BA] SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:4311 BA1 No.455 of 2026 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Harshit Sanwal, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.34 of 2025 under Section 64 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 3/4 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offence Act, P.S. Barkot, District Uttarkashi. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is nothing sufficient to connect the applicant with the commission of alleged crime. He is bonafide student aged about 19 years and is pursuing his 3rd Semester in Bachelor of Arts; he has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned State Counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. As per last order the DNA report was called to ascertain the parentage of the fetus of the victim. As per the DNA report, the applicant is not the biological father of the fetus of the victim and hence there is sufficient ground for enlarging the applicant on bail. 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Ritik Vishwakarma be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 30.05.2026 Arti