Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6209 (CAL)

SUJIT MUKHERJEE v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(P)/288/2025 · 2026-04-06

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct.No.1 D/L 06.04.2026 69 Saikat Mukherjee WPA(P)/288/2025 SUJIT MUKHERJEE VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Amal Sen, A.A.G. Ms. Munmun Ganguly, Adv. …For the Respondent-State Dictated by Sujoy Paul, CJ. 1. None for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Ganguly, learned counsel, for the State. 3. It is seen that since beginning in this petition which was filed in July, 2025, the petitioner either remained absent or prayed for time. The petitioner prayed for setting aside the notice inviting tender dated 26th October, 2024. It appears that petitioner has lost interest in the matter and the petition has rendered infructuous. 4. The PIL is, accordingly, dismissed having rendered infructuous. 5. No order as to costs. (SUJOY PAUL, CJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)