Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6207 (AP)

C. Subbaiah, v. M/s. Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited,

WP/20079/2025 · 2026-07-23

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 24.07.2026 Date of uploading : 24.07.2026 APHC010387452025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 20079/2025 Between: 1. C. SUBBAIA, S/O. C. SUBBARAMAIAH, CASUAL LABOURER, O/O. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS RAJAMPETA, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT, R/O. PULLAMPETA POST AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M/S BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 20, ASHOKA ROAD, SANCHAAR BHAVAN NEW DELHI-110001. 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, ANDHRA PRADESH TELECOM, CIRCLE. M/S.BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM DISTRICT M/S. BHARAT SANCHAR, KADAPA. NOW ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, (ERASTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT) 2 4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL OFFICER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, M/S. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, RAJAMPET, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the action of the respondents in not passing orders on the representation submitted by the petitioner to the Respondents 3 and 4 on 01-07-2025 is opposed to Articles 14, 19, 21 and opposed to principles of natural of justice and direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 01-07-2025. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the representation submitted to the Respondent 3 and 4 dated 01-07-2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESH KOSARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. V SANTHISREE The Court made the following: Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.20079 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not passing orders on the representation submitted by the Petitioner to Respondent Nos.3 and 4 on 01.07.2025 and to declare the same as illegal and arbitrary. 2. After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. 5. No order as to costs. 6. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 24.07.2026 IS 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.20079 of 2025 Date: 24.07.2026 IS