Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6206 (BOM)

ROHIT RAJU SURYAWANSHI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS

WP/10736/2026 · 2026-08-31

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 34-wp-10736-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 34 WRIT PETITION NO. 10736 OF 2026 Rohit Raju Suryawanshi VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. K.B. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Neha Kamble, AGP for State ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that, in view of complaint made by the Petitioner, the Collector has appointed the Committee to look into the grievance of the Petitioner. 2. Since the Collector has already taken cognizance of the complaint of the Petitioner, we see no reason to pass any order in the Writ Petition. 3. The Writ Petition is therefore disposed of. 4. We hope and trust that complaint of the Petitioner will be finally decided expeditiously. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde 2026:BHC-AUG:39681-DB